
Glenn
Adamson has written a book detailing the place of craft in the modern world. There is a definite emphasis on the modern world here, particularly 21st century art world.
Avant garde art today, in principle, has an autonomy from any social, political, and economic influence, and this allows the artistic work to represent a critique of the world(1). In other words, artists have total freedom to create works in reaction to the world around them.
Adamson feels this weighty standard is necessary for the art market, but doesn't give justice to the ornately decorated frames or masterfully woven upholstery, in other words, the crafty items. What
Adamson proposes is to make a new definition for craft, one that totally shifts the word from representing the objects-pottery, quilts, jewelry- to representing the process. In this idea, craft is used in the production of some artworks. For example, an artist might need to master a brush, medium and paint to make a statement about the world through realistic representation on canvas. What
Adamson truly aims to produce is a separate criteria for which craft can be viewed, one that would not be of lesser importance to art. This new place will lead to a
craft world where it "is favorable for all the thinking to operate in process"(p. 167)
This a multi-layered book sifts through the five core principles of craft through the lens of theory, history and criticism.
Adamson defines the core principles as: supplemental (craft produced in total reliance on the experience of creating); material (craft made for physical interaction); skill (cited as the most important in
Adamson's argument, because "it is the most complete embodiment of craft as an active, relational concept rather than a fixed category"[p. 4]); pastoral (the symbolic ideal of craft); amateur (the varying levels of proficiency). The carefully selected illustrations, sixteen colored plates and over thirty black and white images, help the reader to understand the arguments
Adamson makes. A
Piet Mondrien painting is compared to a weaving by Anni
Albers to make a point about the similarities in appearance, but differences in the artists' intent and the
public's reaction.


This book entices the reader to go in for a second read. The many facets that spring off from
Adamson's main theme are so interesting and new (to this reader, at least) that to fully understand the complexities of his arguments, they almost need to be studied. Many opportunities are available for further exploration, mainly because so much relevant information is packed so
succinctly within an interesting argument. Have fun with this book; I know I did.
Notes
1.
Adamson sites Marxist social philosopher Theodor
Adorno from his analysis of art,
Aesthetic Theory and molds
Adorno's ideas to his own.